From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Rust's temporal safety for Ada/SPARK Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 09:27:14 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <1c0e2c7c-4fd6-43d1-9848-f03e1a72bcb3@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: vZYCW951TbFitc4GdEwQJg.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Language: en-US Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46785 Date: 2017-05-15T09:27:14+02:00 List-Id: On 14/05/2017 22:43, Simon Wright wrote: > I don't believe that the tampering checks are mainly, if at all, the > consequnece of using access types. Suppose you are iterating over an > ordered map and you change the current element so as to alter its sort > key? Or, for that matter, any other element? Suppose you delete the > element you are currently visiting? That is an argument against iterators. There is little difference between pointer and iterator. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de