From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,cfc5097715e8ed04 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!209.244.4.230!newsfeed1.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: n versioning is there any other better approach Date: 22 Apr 2006 06:50:23 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <1145599506.289672.274530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> <7cWIiIwG$u01@eisner.encompasserve.org> <25f2g.111486$oL.37868@attbi_s71> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1145706525 31637 192.135.80.34 (22 Apr 2006 11:48:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:3892 Date: 2006-04-22T06:50:23-05:00 List-Id: In article <25f2g.111486$oL.37868@attbi_s71>, "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > Robert A Duff wrote: >> >> Multiple versions can certainly help, but it doesn't help nearly as much >> as one would like. It sure would be nice if, given a probability P of >> error, N versions would make it P**N. With software, it's not that >> good, because my errors are not independent of your errors, because our >> brains think alike to some extent. > > I saw a study once that indicated that multiple versions tend to have > similar errors. Do you recall whether there was any commonality in the versions, other than the specification ? Like language, background of implementers, deadline, etc. ?