From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "G.B." <bauhaus@notmyhomepage.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Does anybody know how to get the elaboration order from
 ObjectAda?
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 06:51:58 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <oebnf5$ail$1@dont-email.me>
References: <2801c29f-d2fd-4014-ac5b-0dad2d17401d@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@notmyhomepage.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 04:48:37 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="139b398793e50ed2ff5594590a3bb7f8";
	logging-data="10837"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+WspcBpMcDT4BTlOA0Xl/dCrVBReyUy1A="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
In-Reply-To: <2801c29f-d2fd-4014-ac5b-0dad2d17401d@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aRvC7T0iXCHwzlNAInoP4OM2vnY=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46662
Date: 2017-05-03T06:51:58+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 02.05.17 08:06, Petter Fryklund wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've googled a lot not come with an answer.

The AppletMagic manual (compiler front end is the same),
when addressing
  "Implementation-Defined Characteristics"
of LRM M, states the following:

"(34) The order of elaboration of library_items. See RM-10.2(18).
  This information is printed out by the -v flag of the adajbuild
  command."

So, maybe adabuild does something similar for ObjectAda.

There is another option that may be worth mentioning, -r, to

   "Use a more “friendly” elaboration order. The default is
     to use an order that is more likely to fail but which
     can lead to more portable programs."

I vaguely remember some AWK program that analyses the .info
files generated by the tools.