From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada wikibook help needed (O-O)
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:06:23 -0500
Organization: JSA Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <odlssv$i31$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
References: <odhv2v$9vi$1@dont-email.me> <odi10p$ojq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com
X-Trace: franka.jacob-sparre.dk 1493071583 18529 24.196.82.226 (24 Apr 2017
 22:06:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:06:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46622
Date: 2017-04-24T17:06:23-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message 
news:odi10p$ojq$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 2017-04-23 12:22, G.B. wrote:
...
>> Is it correct to say "static call" at all,
>
> Why not? A statically bound call.

Statically bound call is OK, but  "static call" is easily confused with "a 
call on a static function" (as in 4.9). I'd think the latter before the 
former. I definitely suggest avoiding that sort of terminology if one is 
trying to describe Ada using its terminology.

                            Randy.