From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interfaces.C questions Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 23:24:42 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: BYuA7L7MRjuLLjcoGHOBxw.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46416 Date: 2017-03-17T23:24:42+01:00 List-Id: On 2017-03-17 22:12, hreba wrote: > These are my first steps with Interfaces.C: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > with Interfaces.C; > > package GSL is > > package C renames Interfaces.C; Renaming packages is a bad idea. Either use fully-qualified names "Interfaces.C.size_t" or else do use-clause "size_t". Renaming lacks advantages of either approach inheriting their corresponding disadvantages. > type size_t is new C.int; size_t is defined in Interfaces.C. > type Real_Function is access function (x: C.double) return C.double; pragma Convention (C, Real_Function); > function Bessel_J0 (x: C.double) return C.double; > > function Integration_QNG > (f: Real_Function; > a, b, epsabs, epsrel: C.double; > result, abserr: out C.double; > neval: out size_t) > return C.int; function Integration_QNG (f: Real_Function; a, b, epsabs, epsrel: Interfaces.C.double; result, abserr: access Interfaces.C.double; neval: access Interfaces.C.size_t) return Interfaces.C.int; P.S. For convention C assume this: 1. out T, in out T, access T are equivalent 2. in T and access T are equivalent when T is non-scalar (you can pass int, array, or record, the compiler will sort that out) -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de