From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_WORDY, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,641f47d4563311a6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Ken Garlington" Subject: Re: Array of bytes type Date: 2000/05/19 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 625395831 References: <3924E094.6B03B5BD@concentric.net> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Complaints-To: abuse@flash.net X-Trace: news.flash.net 958742292 216.215.85.195 (Fri, 19 May 2000 08:18:12 CDT) Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 08:18:12 CDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Joseph P Vlietstra" wrote in message news:3924E094.6B03B5BD@concentric.net... > (We're using a 32-bit processor, but a lot of spacecraft still > use 1750A processors where the storage element is 16 bits.) If you want your code to be compatible with implementations that still use the 1750A, you may want to consider using code that's compliant with Ada83. In this case, I would probably "roll my own" with my own definition of Unsigned_8.