From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,85034d1ac78a66eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-13 14:19:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Operating System Date: 13 Mar 2002 16:19:10 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3c77b476.322111671@news.cis.dfn.de> <3C88E0D1.89161C16@despammed.com> <3C8F5D44.2E2E2EE7@despammed.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1016057952 21834 192.135.80.34 (13 Mar 2002 22:19:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21169 Date: 2002-03-13T16:19:10-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Pam Kelly" writes: > The Ada versions won't need maintenance :-) > > Seriously, to prove the point that Ada is in itself superior the Ada > versions would have to stick so closely to the design of the C versions as > to be more or less straight translations - which would mean they would > benefit from past maintenance of the logic. That would also mean they would have to be wart-for-wart compatible, even when that means turning off Ada safety features. So what is the point of having an Ada implmentation ?