From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-10 18:49:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny01.gnilink.net.POSTED!0e8a908a!not-for-mail From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems References: <1731094.1f7Irsyk1h@linux1.krischik.com> <3ff20cc8.635997032@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <3ff9df16.30249104@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <1665674.ZrTUW4qaQq@linux1.krischik.com> <1073409810.463948@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1073421950.964139@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3ffd9d14.1526346@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <1073659951.261166@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:49:56 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.84.196.162 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny01.gnilink.net 1073789396 162.84.196.162 (Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:49:56 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:49:56 EST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4321 Date: 2004-01-11T02:49:56+00:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Ease of change? What do C++ programmers say about operator[]? Somehow I don't think Ada programmers' days are filled with flipping between arrays and functions, but that's just me. In C++, one is expected to use operator[] for things that are "like" arrays - containers which can be indexed by something. Note that C++ allows Ada-like syntax as well: a(i) = b(j); because you can overload operator() (the function-call operator).