From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,103b407e8b68350b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-11 14:10:34 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++ , ADA and the Joint Strike Fighter (Off-topic)
Date: 11 Jan 2003 16:10:30 -0600
Organization: Berbee Information Networks Corporation
Message-ID: <oK$dhQDJBSHL@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <VtlQ9.42144$%3.10762066@twister.neo.rr.com>
 <C900921B7A3FDDD4.5FD752FF5D42F9AF.349D2214D482463F@lp.airnews.net>
 <3E1A020F.8BD6EB6B@adaworks.com> <2pmp1vsho66rck32a1h8k4rioon0lvum22@4ax.com>
 <sBVS9.7505$E83.785@news2.central.cox.net>
 <avhaec$fi1$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>
 <0k8r1vodhicr0bvqr8v9g3t40g8humrv7l@4ax.com>
 <c36iva.b38.ln@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <e7vs1v83dbnon7prd0d1gnb8suq6713pku@4ax.com>
 <l91kva.gd1.ln@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <5alt1vgcj5usfi5348dm038ogmtoccp5o4@4ax.com> <H01kDjtzy1$7@eisneOrganization:
 LJK Software
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1042322926 23087 192.135.80.34 (11 Jan 2003
 22:08:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:08:46 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32925
Date: 2003-01-11T16:10:30-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <bh_T9.70$bG2.179@news13-win.server.ntlworld.com>, "chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> writes:
> Larry Kilgallen wrote:
>> In article <5alt1vgcj5usfi5348dm038ogmtoccp5o4@4ax.com>, faust <urfaust@optushome.com.au> writes:
>> 
>>>How are you different from those who support and help Al Queda ?
>> 
>> They don't make off-topic post in this newsgroup.
> 
> 
> How do you know? ;)

I have ways of knowing, but discussing them would be off-topic :-)