From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f849b,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public X-Google-Thread: f5d71,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 101b33,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid101b33,public X-Google-Thread: 115aec,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public X-Google-Thread: 146b77,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid146b77,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public From: "Siamak Kaveh" Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java Date: 1999/01/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 432558351 References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net> <01be3f5e$26453ca0$5704fbd1@longslide> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Trace: carnaval.risq.qc.ca 916326292 132.207.60.24 (Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:04:52 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:04:52 EDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.vxworks,comp.lang.java,comp.java.advocacy,comp.realtime,comp.arch.embedded,comp.object,comp.lang.java.programmer Date: 1999-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Craig Garrett wrote in message <01be3f5e$26453ca0$5704fbd1@longslide>... ... Ada is right behind it in that support, (well, ok, FORTRAN has alot of support too, but that is just for the legacy code and die-hard programmers that are over 40 years old and never did learn how to program in a real language, so they are stuck with it ... I bet you don't know anything about FORTRAN 95 ( the latest ISO standard) and/or High Performance Fortran (HPF) and upcoming standard FORTRAN 2000. If you are brave put your lines in (comp.lang.fortran)