From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: State of the compiler market Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 14:46:41 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <5881b0ca-3a11-442e-88ce-18d0a6142c24@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nonlegitur@notmyhomepage.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 13:44:47 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="87bc473cc104e764cecfd93104bf1860"; logging-data="939"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/HIFhbxvrxpTmVCeUYyoEcasjCOq9IvFQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:OtAbsFgh2nhFBDxxahFauu28UUI= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:33405 Date: 2017-02-25T14:46:41+01:00 List-Id: On 25/02/2017 12:29, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > 3. Ada parser is the least problem, so minor that there is nothing to talk about. It is a matter of a pair days to work out. For example, importing a C function, or calling an Ada function that is known to use setjmp/longjmp, how can the Ada compiler optimize use of local variables passed to that function by reference, or by copy, in the presence of Ada exceptions? How do other advertised languages tackle these situations? I guess that there is the usual rhetorical appeal, such as to "pragmatism". "We have never heard of such problems." "Talk to our service representative to see if we can find a solution for you." $...