From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why can't Ada use dot notation on private types?
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:27:13 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <o7am71$13o1$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <d1956163-4a96-4e39-97d5-0a516e9a954c@googlegroups.com>
 <o77gh4$6vf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o7ajn5$it2$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: BYuA7L7MRjuLLjcoGHOBxw.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.7.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:33266
Date: 2017-02-06T21:27:13+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2017-02-06 20:44, Randy Brukardt wrote:

> The problems mainly come from the possibility of implicit .all and 'Access.

Perfect, why is this a problem? It is just what is needed. I want to 
override "all", so let me do this.

P.S. Ampersand notation must be definable just like dot notation is.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de