From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Extend slices for n dimensional arrays for Ada 202X Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:53:41 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Reply-To: nonlegitur@notmyhomepage.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:52:01 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="121ff019819f15162932b5a8eb4b6528"; logging-data="32584"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180+8DeaZRUe/q9AQhVDIl/hqYZaQAg+Lk=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:aYo7WnFSovp9BAkAmyJy9oTndTY= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:33196 Date: 2017-01-27T14:53:41+01:00 List-Id: On 27.01.17 10:34, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 26/01/2017 19:29, Randy Brukardt wrote: > >> So I don't see this happening - it doesn't make sense in the context of Ada >> implementation strategies. > > That is why I keep on saying, give users the array interface (and the array slice interface) and let users implement their custom arrays. > Will some Iterator_Interface and generalized loop iteration not provide for custom arrays? -- "HOTDOGS ARE NOT BOOKMARKS" Springfield Elementary teaching staff