From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8623fab5750cd6aa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A. Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Improving Ada's image - Was: 7E7 Flight Controls Electronics Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:13:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <40ba315a$0$254$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk> <04udnR-eHNChzSbdRVn-vw@gbronline.com> <7J0xc.7371$8k4.269106@news20.bellglobal.com> <1086630278.542788@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <8xlxc.27603$sS2.845496@news20.bellglobal.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de /w2ixiK9cjroAUa2DQrDDw9rlaTYNrK7fHJDQ3bSxxgPuTcz0= X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1284 Date: 2004-06-09T10:13:30+02:00 List-Id: On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 04:39:59 GMT, I R T wrote: >"Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" writes: > >> The bottom line is that unless Linux is perfect, you >> cannot state that Ada could not have done better. > >Or Smalltalk, Eifel , Lisp, CPL, APL , PLI or any other language. > >So what is your point ? The point is that either revenues or number of customers tell very little about technical merits of a software product. They are almost uncorrelated. Talking about perfection people are quickly switching from technical perfection to marketing one and back. Using an appropriate period of oscillation one could prove anything... >Perhaps angels can be programmed in Ada too... But the fallen ones were in C++! (:-)) -- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de