From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed16b323e88cf5a3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-11 04:06:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!4.24.21.153!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Security Date: 11 Mar 2003 06:06:45 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <1PaHX42Wk9$S@eisner.encompasserve.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1047384372 18645 192.135.80.34 (11 Mar 2003 12:06:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35182 Date: 2003-03-11T06:06:45-06:00 List-Id: In article , Preben Randhol writes: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: >> In article , porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes: >>> P.S. As we posters in c.l.a deal with security so much, shouldn't we >>> introduce the "spoken rule" to digitally sign messages? Maybe we >>> should have our own keyserver at a place like AdaPower? >> >> Perhaps those of you who use PGP should. > > Signing messages has little to do with security. It only deals with > authenticity. My training has been to associate security with the initials C.I.A., standing for the words: Confidentiality Integrity Availability And I would count Authenticity as part of Integrity.