From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!reality.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 2012 Constraints (WRT an Ada IR) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:15:52 -0600 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <92ed75e9-baae-455c-9e34-53348dc6eaef@googlegroups.com> <03847fd7-5699-48de-bb3c-ef5512398f26@googlegroups.com> <3ef819e8-55f7-4ef7-9f37-77e6abc33f98@googlegroups.com> <47366b42-c0a3-41bf-a44a-5241c109d60f@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com X-Trace: franka.jacob-sparre.dk 1481066107 24852 24.196.82.226 (6 Dec 2016 23:15:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 23:15:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32644 Date: 2016-12-06T17:15:52-06:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message news:o24phv$1ou6$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 2016-12-05 23:12, Randy Brukardt wrote: ... >> Until you compare to the alternative, which is a subprogram body that >> gives >> the wrong answer without detection. As I said in another message, a >> visible >> bug is much better than an invisible bug. > > The alternative is a contract to raise exception. So there is no bug > anymore, just well-defined behavior. All contracts raise an exception (I'm pretty sure Assertion_Error is an exception :-). Moreover, most contracts (at least the ones I'd write) raise specific exceptions (not Assertion_Error). Indeed, this is a far better way to define something that raises an exception than an English comment. (Which is the only other alternative for the specification - and its the specification that matters, not the body.) Randy. Randy.