From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM,T_HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Mr. Man-wai Chang" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Simplest Ada program Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 17:04:03 +0800 Organization: Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:02:47 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f3698ca0082f0533d5dc032749719dad"; logging-data="14407"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+c2/lazM94EMiUI+rHlYci" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:HQPad4L538OGN5zmUcWrMUV+gZY= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32451 Date: 2016-11-25T17:04:03+08:00 List-Id: On 22/11/2016 6:20 AM, Niklas Holsti wrote: >> Could you compile your simplest Ada programs in other platforms and run >> loaders to time each executable? > > Of course one could do that, but why? The "simplest Ada program" is not > useful for anything, so why is its start-up time of interest? Any real > program will have a different (probably larger) start-up time, plus the > time it takes to actually do something. It should give you the minimum amount of time to run an Ada program in a one-user operating system? > What do you _really_ want to know? How do you benchmark real-time Ada programs? ;)