From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Active record in Ada? Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:33:22 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lDxRHYOjBtXVpH9sAkYLGw.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32353 Date: 2016-11-16T23:33:22+02:00 List-Id: Victor Porton wrote: > Victor Porton wrote: > >> Is there such a thing as implemented "active record" pattern for Ada? >> >> I realize that it can't be done with .member accessors for attributes >> because Ada does not support dynamic attributes, but something similar >> enough to classic active record can be done with .Get("member") and >> .Set("member", ...) style. > > Wait, it can be done with implicit dereferences. Well not x.member but x("member"). This is ok also, however. in Ada2012. >> I wonder, is there any open source implementation of this in Ada? > -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org