From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is Python higher level than Ada?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:46:12 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <o0hnv3$k96$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <o0g9mu$m6p$1@gioia.aioe.org> <874m37ewvw.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <o0hl9r$8f9$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vZYCW951TbFitc4GdEwQJg.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32341
Date: 2016-11-16T14:46:12+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 16/11/2016 14:01, G.B. wrote:

> Formally, is there something high above types?

Type types, generics, categories.

> The highest level language will be that which allows
> a PHB to express both the problem description and its
> solution in just one speech bubble addressing Dilbert.

The highest level procedural language has single statement:

   do it

The highest level declarative language has single declaration:

   let it be

(:-))

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de