From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Building Matreshka on Windows Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:19:11 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <3c41f737-a1d9-40a5-aea3-08c4b61baaa8@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:18:45 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="af1e9377846db2a2caf97a297d2765f9"; logging-data="18552"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+c2Q85Y8usz69yj28c13Pn3KkykkCMs8A=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:uCxAAEwXD/KtMutiSYXpmHh4bCw= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32239 Date: 2016-11-04T10:19:11+01:00 List-Id: On 04.11.16 09:55, Simon Wright wrote: > The input formats to be processed by this RE are very limited, and under > AdaCore's control I was hoping that the formats are controlled, and few, but given the generic nature of GPRBuild, won't similar declarations of REs be used for "guessing" versions of tools not under AdaCore's control? Like, what if those version numbers will be reflecting Git tags applied by third parties, like "v6.1-exp_BH-20160428A"? On the plus side, it might feel like an easy job when one needs to integrate a patched tool by adjusting REs. TTBOMK, correct REs aren't that easy, though. -- "HOTDOGS ARE NOT BOOKMARKS" Springfield Elementary teaching staff