From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Adam Jensen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Failure of the Schiaparelli lander: A software problem? Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 06:29:28 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <04236df5-938d-49df-a74e-01faac6f7a15@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:29:04 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="917d08f02f8b1a7a444826479a4fff51"; logging-data="25536"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19L/cT59iHCSLFGgNsPIN8L" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lgeq8KsVnxuBuSy36EOkoH7TTZc= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32213 Date: 2016-10-31T06:29:28-04:00 List-Id: On 10/30/2016 03:19 AM, Dirk Craeynest wrote: > FYI, in a press release [1] earlier this year, AdaCore wrote: > > Thales Alenia Space implemented in Ada two ExoMars On-Board Software > (OBSW) components: one for the Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) on an ERC32 > target, and one for the Entry, Descent and Landing Demonstrator > Module (EDM) on a LEON2 target. > > So there already was (at least some) Ada software on the Schiaparelli > lander. The above quote seems to suggest that all software on the > lander was in Ada, as the latter is named as one of the two components > implemented in Ada... > > Maybe someone from AdaCore or Thales on CLA can tell us more? > > [1] http://www.adacore.com/press/ada-on-board-gnat-pro-helps-exomars-get-to-the-red-planet/ Supposition: what if having people say the same thing repeatedly in a variety of verbose ways isn't the best way to insure that: a) they understand what they are saying, and b) what they are saying is correct.