From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Coyo T Stormcaller <coyo@darkdna.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Full view of limited extension?
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:06:28 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <nv176o$lcp$2@dont-email.me>
References: <121792c4-3f9d-4d89-8ac5-88375ffb1110@googlegroups.com>
 <nu93p3$gd6$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <5c6388d5-8545-4fa3-9c8c-228850e23028@googlegroups.com>
 <nur5ki$epv$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Reply-To: coyo@darkdna.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 04:05:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="c06af2c6f3056f381b15db0024074a3b";
	logging-data="21913"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ztjerKWWFT6FpFKCignwCG4IJsWQ1qzk="
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DNkfzbLcngTXla37pNeLcfUIkXU=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32194
Date: 2016-10-28T23:06:28-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Randy Brukardt wrote:

>>This statement will not be popular on this group, but I have never had
>>similar problems with
>>C++ - and we are talking about language features that are already at least
>>one decade old.
>>Something went wrong somewhere.
> 
> Yes, your illegal code. :-) It was someone's attempt to port your code to
> a different Ada compiler (one that properly diagnosed the illegality) that
> caused (a) the ACATS test to be created, and (b) GNAT to be fixed [in some
> order].

I am among giants.