From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Bug in Ada - Latin 1 is not a subset of UTF-8 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:49:14 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <86f0d2fe-d498-4bc4-bb9d-e34629c89bb4@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: XXXaKfQ6zzC8DMOzOT/pgA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32160 Date: 2016-10-22T09:49:14+02:00 List-Id: On 2016-10-22 07:51, G.B. wrote: > On 21.10.16 18:43, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> For an UTF-8 string proper no checks would be ever required when a >> character is appanded. > > No Unicode sequence in UTF should ever exist visibly in a > program other than either during parsing, or during output. Right. Any encoded string must implement two distinct interfaces: an array of characters and a sequence of encoding elements (e.g. octets). They somehow fit to each other for Latin-1 and UCS-2 strings, but for majority of encoding methods they are drastically different. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de