From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Markus_Sch=c3=b6pflin?= <no.spam@spam.spam>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Numerics, Accuracy of trigonometric functions
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:23:47 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <nt7t3i$1b4m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <nt7sgs$1a06$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: MdpKeRr+sx3LK7JQiK5aNw.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.3.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32031
Date: 2016-10-07T12:23:47+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

What I forgot to add is that the results are the same using SHORT_FLOAT, 
LONG_FLOAT, or LONG_LONG_FLOAT when calling cos(x) without the cycle parameter.

But when adding the cycle parameter, LONG_FLOAT and LONG_LONG_FLOAT yield 
correct results, only SHORT_FLOAT is still wrong.

Markus