From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e4bb63e08046e1a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-24 14:22:42 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: is exception when others => null; smart?
Date: 24 Oct 2002 16:22:40 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <ns55kKIl$MbX@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <slrnarfvcc.4ud.randhol+news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3DB8204B.2080804@attbi.com> <x7v8z0negx6.fsf@pushface.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1035494487 16608 192.135.80.34 (24 Oct 2002
 21:21:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:21:27 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30114
Date: 2002-10-24T16:22:40-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <x7v8z0negx6.fsf@pushface.org>, Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
> Mark Biggar <mark.a.biggar@attbi.com> writes:
> 
>> Probably not.  If you want the opposite policy change it to:
>> 
>> when others => raise;
>> 
>> BTW, make it an optional feature which way you want it.
> 
> If you do make it optional, the options should be
> 
> * have "when others => raise;".
> 
> * have no handler at all.

The important difference between these options, I presume,
would be whether or not you are being paid by the line of code written :-)