From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d6f01a357b7f98ce
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Direct_Io for Filesystem question
References: 
 <817032b7-4e8a-4589-9e44-00e7aef1fb06@v53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
 	<io6Mk.402077$yE1.45541@attbi_s21>
 <dbd243e1-dbf9-43cf-a2ff-6d70e5327cab@v30g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <dbd243e1-dbf9-43cf-a2ff-6d70e5327cab@v30g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nr8Mk.402511$yE1.157144@attbi_s21>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com
X-Trace: attbi_s21 1224807251 12.201.97.213 (Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:14:11 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:14:11 GMT
Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:14:11 GMT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2477
Date: 2008-10-24T00:14:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

mhamel_98@yahoo.com wrote:
> 
> I'm not *certain* I understand what you are saying, but my
> interpretation of it led me to wrapping the direct_io.file_type and
> its functionality in a protected type and bingo, all is well.  I'm
> curious if you meant something altogether different.

Yes, that's what I meant. Technically a protected object is wrong, because I/O 
operations are "potentially blocking".

-- 
Jeff Carter
"When danger reared its ugly head, he bravely
turned his tail and fled."
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
60