From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Can anyone help with GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators ? (Possible
 memory corruption)
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:08:34 -0700
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net;
 news.eternal-september.org
Message-ID: <nqscvn$j2h$1@dont-email.me>
References: <slrnnsot2o.1cq.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <397dd8cb-2afc-43cd-972d-3b1a5a90cd5d@googlegroups.com>
 <slrnnsu608.1cq.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <877fao24da.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <lyoa40rb84.fsf@pushface.org>
 <0b79fce9-b898-4a1c-91fb-ca41e87b4dd5@googlegroups.com>
 <lyr38us4qk.fsf@pushface.org>
 <08e0581a-30f1-4cc5-972c-2d6c539d9df6@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:08:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="6df4b173985f7c5c043cea362c370ff7";
	logging-data="19537"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18N309fVYEOeuBMvG2+9ydYCb/O3+JSnGg="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2.0
In-Reply-To: <08e0581a-30f1-4cc5-972c-2d6c539d9df6@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lakea5oSY+84DheqlFAjQ/Qj9uQ=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31733
Date: 2016-09-08T12:08:34-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 09/08/2016 11:03 AM, Anh Vo wrote:
> On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 10:04:06 AM UTC-7, Simon Wright wrote:
>> Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Then, what would be the proper fix?
>>
>> To what? If you mean the apparent bug in GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators
> 
> Yes.

Clearly it needs to have the assumption, that all Strings have a lower bound of
1, eliminated.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"English bed-wetting types."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
15