From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Brian Drummond Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Inspirels Ada on cortex tutorial linker issue Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 11:58:59 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <24d4ffc3-3915-4102-96ae-68d11d881443@googlegroups.com> <2efe4d01-4cd4-4aea-bc54-98ea5f26ec8a@googlegroups.com> <2cf07aa6-9cbb-44bc-8042-601c57c85457@googlegroups.com> <328fa4a3-6215-4101-835a-7eaf7ed72a8c@googlegroups.com> <1d62cc93-324a-4c87-b9d3-67c24cb54c5f@googlegroups.com> <114c0223-e914-4a5c-b533-d1b924895181@googlegroups.com> <9ee99ad0-2fc5-47d3-bd2e-6f418f23a46a@googlegroups.com> <91322cd6-710a-424c-851e-9b5eb013e8a1@googlegroups.com> <3eb92410-d774-40b3-b4b5-a1f0e8417dfc@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 11:58:59 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="da745e888d4a5182b5fda6212bbb0a63"; logging-data="24935"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IgIlupWLlJmibRort6qwCXzBCy0KE3j8=" User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT b8fc14e git.gnome.org/git/pan2) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NLDXAUainbOIKn53LPVmn5IG058= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31695 Date: 2016-09-03T11:58:59+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 02 Sep 2016 06:40:40 -0700, AdaMagica wrote: > Am Freitag, 2. September 2016 14:05:24 UTC+2 schrieb Maciej Sobczak: >> Then somebody else must have written the Ada code that I can see now, >> which is so heavily attached to the hardware (including packing of >> pointer values in record fields of forced sizes) that it is probably >> easier to rewrite it than port to any other target. >> Language is a tool, you still need good engineering principles to use >> it properly. > > You're absolutely right. A good language does not force people to write > good code. > > I've seen code like this: > > I: Integer; > ... > if I in Integer then ... My favourite: while (1 = 1) loop ... end loop; I imagine this was a creative response to a compiler error message "expected type boolean; found type integer" from "while (1) loop" -- Brian