From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Qun-Ying <zhu.qunying@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: zLibAda vs ZipAda (which should I use, if any)?
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:02:33 -0700
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <npnmd8$14lq$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <5d516246-3a7c-4be5-abef-c34fb0f5c753@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: QG+sVfyUW3QoXBz9uF2CgQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31574
Date: 2016-08-25T14:02:33-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I haven't used both, but zLibAda is only a wrapper for zlib, which does 
not read zip file. Only ZipAda could read zip file.