From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Brian Drummond Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What's the eaerliest GNAT that can be built with 4.9.3? Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:33:07 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:33:07 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="da745e888d4a5182b5fda6212bbb0a63"; logging-data="10470"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19VawqN4I1wUyest5JgkstH77QM/0M/9I0=" User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT b8fc14e git.gnome.org/git/pan2) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zt3Oe82tEydM09iaDicDnG62IEw= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31515 Date: 2016-08-23T11:33:07+00:00 List-Id: On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:25:43 -0700, Lucretia wrote: > As the subject really. > > I've successfully built 4.9.3 with that bootstrap and then using the > built 4.9.3 to build 5.1.0, so that's good, just need to know the other > way around. Not a definitive answer but I would expect 4.8.x to build cleanly enough. At the other extreme, I can report complete build failures of 4.3 (for AVR-Ada) with compilers of the 4.5 era onwards, because they stopped accepting negative enums (!!!) in the C sources which were present in the earlier compilers. So I would place 4.4 as a lower bound of what *might* build and 4.8 as a likely upper bound. Between those, you probably have to bisect... -- Brian