From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!reality.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to write "Hello" to a text file without a line terminator
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:35:25 -0500
Organization: JSA Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <notjjj$82m$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
References: 
 <2cc97e17-313e-44b8-b335-8d5e815e925a@googlegroups.com><nojti9$8sq$1@gioia.aioe.org><4c49991e-9001-464f-afbb-3fcbf78e5656@googlegroups.com><nol1ao$fpp$1@dont-email.me><ee68c010-85f0-4c38-b335-cdb3815f45c4@googlegroups.com><nom7bg$t7l$1@dont-email.me><41b076f1-66b0-4142-8b91-0e717b6176c2@googlegroups.com><nonne4$606$1@dont-email.me><7dd84caf-d094-4498-a6f1-91e275f09346@googlegroups.com><lyvaz321nv.fsf@pushface.org>
 <nopbk2$1qmn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <lyr39r1yeo.fsf@pushface.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com
X-Trace: franka.jacob-sparre.dk 1471304116 8278 24.196.82.226 (15 Aug 2016
 23:35:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 23:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31450
Date: 2016-08-15T18:35:25-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Simon Wright" <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message 
news:lyr39r1yeo.fsf@pushface.org...
...
> I am saying that (it seems to me that) it is impossible to read back
> from Sequential_IO with an unconstrained type even on the same machine
> with the same compiler.

No problem for an unconstrained record type with defaults. I agree it 
wouldn't be useful for an array.

                              Randy.