From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "John B. Matthews" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Anti-Ada FUD (rant) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:32:54 -0400 Organization: The Wasteland Message-ID: References: <2f813569-5ff8-4c20-a5ab-8538e6514906@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: LQJtZWzu+iKlBROuDg+IUg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Original-Bytes: 2015 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:183390 Date: 2013-09-20T19:32:54-04:00 List-Id: In article <2f813569-5ff8-4c20-a5ab-8538e6514906@googlegroups.com>, krfkeith@gmail.com wrote: > http://www.jargon.net/jargonfile/a/Ada.html > > > Hackers are nearly unanimous in observing that, technically, it is > precisely what one might expect given that kind of endorsement by > fiat; designed by committee, crockish, difficult to use, and overall > a disastrous, multi-billion-dollar boondoggle (one common description > is "The PL/I of the 1980s"). Hackers find Ada's exception-handling > and inter-process communication features particularly hilarious. > The editorial bias is epitomized in these two links: The C programming language fares only slightly better: Which reminds me of Greenspun's tenth rule & corollary, disingenuously missing from the jargon file itself: -- John B. Matthews trashgod at gmail dot com