From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5af5c381381ac5a7 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: "John B. Matthews" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada requires too much typing! Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:52:09 -0400 Organization: The Wasteland Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: LQJtZWzu+iKlBROuDg+IUg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12131 Date: 2010-05-28T11:52:09-04:00 List-Id: In article , Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote: > Le Fri, 28 May 2010 07:25:15 +0200, Luis Espinal > a écrit: [...] > > lack of operator overloading I prefer Ada's approach in this, but Java is acceptable. Here's a simple example implemented in both Ada and Java for comparison: > and checked exceptions were What is this about “checked” exceptions ? > (a non-Java guru talking). In Java, the presence of a suitable handler for checked exceptions is enforced at compile-time: The feature may be regarded as controversial: -- John B. Matthews trashgod at gmail dot com