From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New IEEE Language Popularity Ratings Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 01:32:23 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <31c22983-150c-4dab-abba-588e15f75914@googlegroups.com> <84d258dc-b60d-4a49-9af4-27dd6f3e5f5f@googlegroups.com> <1703ca9a-2665-4435-9564-4abd8a77ebe9@googlegroups.com> <12ca4276-cd1e-49ae-b5dc-56432e721687@googlegroups.com> <2a3fc931-feb3-4542-a4c9-e43affa5c4f4@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 23:32:24 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fd154375e955be7895736fc7a1239f36"; logging-data="16173"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19TwZ7sGv53PwZPZJUuL+0fMp2rRdXYibQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:TmH9jrEdx6csqp//dLFWf0dA43I= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31312 Date: 2016-08-07T01:32:23+02:00 List-Id: On 06.08.16 22:59, brbarkstrom@gmail.com wrote: > Along this line, is there documentation of which random number tests GNAT > used for its generator? In only a clerkish way, not in an experts way, I found the following answer in GNAT's s-rannum.ads, to whose body the comments in GNAT GPL 2014's Ada.Numerics.{Discrete,Float}_Rnadom are referring (in a-nu{di,fl}ra.ads): -- The generator currently provided by this package has an extremely long -- period (at least 2**19937-1), and passes the Big Crush test suite, with the -- exception of the two linear complexity tests. Therefore, it is suitable -- for simulations, but should not be used as a cryptographic pseudo-random -- source without additional processing. -- "HOTDOGS ARE NOT BOOKMARKS" Springfield Elementary teaching staff