From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Lundin?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Exception traceback when using TDM-GCC 5.1.0-3 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:08:04 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <66240de6-d3a8-458d-9eb9-1214f790831c@googlegroups.com> <22f2e37f-dc90-42ce-a6d3-42f0a471c4d6@googlegroups.com> <6178bf6c-6125-43b2-86c4-aeb08be48442@googlegroups.com> <273d77a5-55a6-4de6-abbe-93bb61ecfdc3@googlegroups.com> <4bd0a4ff-8262-41ee-bb5c-23672206a59a@googlegroups.com> <8a97f7ff-7fda-480b-9f6e-68a4f2995b83@googlegroups.com> <26fc8fd2-f81b-45f6-a584-e8558239eae0@googlegroups.com> <1114393d-a298-4b49-bae8-43ded7879887@googlegroups.com> <737eb192-86eb-4c09-9b60-759ae29987f2@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:07:36 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a42f3680f3ea8c27f7d5856b8c0ea2be"; logging-data="30551"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+AuStyT6E9FPP1q1+9+A38" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.7.0 In-Reply-To: <737eb192-86eb-4c09-9b60-759ae29987f2@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:ujyxEO3uXOGQa2CjI7eZkCIc70M= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31218 Date: 2016-07-29T12:08:04+02:00 List-Id: On 2016-07-29 08:40, ahlan.marriott@gmail.com wrote: > Dear Björn, > Thanks for the info. > Although I would have thought trying to spawn a new process and pipe information to it from a dying process would have been a even less of a good idea ;-) > Perhaps yes. But we just let addr2line print to std-out as usual. and the parent's std-out is redirected to a file, which means addr2line's output is written to the parent's std-out. But you wanted to log it in a separate file ? -- -- Björn