From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New IEEE Language Popularity Ratings Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:47:43 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <31c22983-150c-4dab-abba-588e15f75914@googlegroups.com> <8dc9ed69-a8dd-4870-8326-0aa177f2458f@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:47:45 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b2a56017056b7a93fd8f150bc15494b9"; logging-data="28417"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/eLacObJtoc/0IaR1Aqh5Yti7cZMQruQ4=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 In-Reply-To: <8dc9ed69-a8dd-4870-8326-0aa177f2458f@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:bUmxY0Dgriz4UjccWe0bzvhryes= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31207 Date: 2016-07-28T22:47:43+02:00 List-Id: On 28.07.16 22:19, brbarkstrom@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 11:05:45 AM UTC-4, Alejandro R. Mosteo wrote: > >>> http://spectrum.ieee.org/static/interactive-the-top-programming-languages-2016 > > I think there may be > some ways of interacting with the article to provide various sorts > of rankings. Just clicked on a few buttons. For example, hid all but what remains with the phone button. Still C at 1. How on earth can C, and C++, and C# be ranked at positions 1, 3, and 5 for smartphones? (Because of Android/Linux (C), whatever (C++), and Xamarin (C# for non-Microsoft phones?) They've got to be kidding. If not, I'd hope some day they start also measuring profit generated by languages. Public sources of $-for-language include stack*.com: their job ads seem to be sensitive to programming languages.