From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: SCTP implementation
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:33:28 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <njr0d3$1jtd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <7fa2ada2-2189-4daf-840d-5f293005ac67@googlegroups.com>
 <njpo24$6jn$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <9a17406a-a965-4249-ab62-b3e84a5e524f@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vFKDMXWEWKqnQQwESBoFfw.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30739
Date: 2016-06-15T09:33:28+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 15/06/2016 00:20, David Botton wrote:
> Unless he wants sctp over udp

Raw Ethernet would make far more sense than that. But I guess that in 
case of any reasonable demand MS will implement it for Windows, fitted 
into the existing socket infrastructure.

P.S. I don't know if SCTP will make it. So far it seems that there is no 
interest in SCTP. The network infrastructure keeps on improving 
drastically. Whatever gains SCTP might provide they look minuscule in 
comparison.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de