From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Lundin?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ANN: Introducing AdaBase - Thick database bindings for Ada Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 13:31:37 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 11:27:51 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4a14fbc3936a9349c7c59849b8b21d41"; logging-data="6481"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18KZfvLkyfLz/BxsPf9sIhp" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.7.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:oEX0LsabcxWHUPOsrH01XODF7dU= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30405 Date: 2016-05-14T13:31:37+02:00 List-Id: On 2016-05-14 12:41, jrmarino wrote: > Guys, nobody has to use this. I created it for me because none of the existing ones were satisfactory *to me*. > It's under a permissive license. I'm just sharing. > I get the idea that people are posting opinions without actually reviewing the documention > (which I spent many many hours writing). > In any case, all I am doing is letting people know a new non-copyleft option exists with the assumption that some people will be interested. I like the idea. Not too many discussions about Ada here is about using it with an sql-database. I use them all the time - I guess that is a design pattern I'm used to. And not too many good solutions exits. Most packages lacks some datatype, like date/time/timestamp, or clobs, or something else. I will certainly have a look and see how you solve 'prepare' for PostgreSQL, when you are done. As is, I got a fair bit of code using my own binding. If the api is close enough to what I use now, I sure will consider switch. If I can't, then looking at other peoples's code gives new ideas. And hearing that there is a good set of documentation is always nice. -- Björn