From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Could you write a BSD like os in ADA? Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 17:03:27 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <79e591f0-3c3e-42b2-ad1f-3e59a031531e@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1462917807 19153 24.196.82.226 (10 May 2016 22:03:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 22:03:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30381 Date: 2016-05-10T17:03:27-05:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey R. Carter" wrote in message news:ngqtri$36t$1@dont-email.me... > On 05/09/2016 01:14 PM, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> >> But your real point is that it is 2016, and what is the point of >> recreating >> a 40-year old design? If we can't do better today (on some dimension of >> "better"), that means that CS is completely stalled since then (and >> that's >> clearly not true; SPARK alone disproves it). There's also the practical >> issue: If you actually wanted someone to use it, you'd need to offer >> something different. Oliver's reply gives some approaches to that >> problem. > > Unfortunately, it's 2016, and almost everything is either Windows or some > flavor of Unix these days, neither of which is very new. Mac OS X, iOS, > Android, and Chrome OS, to name a few, are all Yet Another Version of > Unix. Exactly my point: if you want anyone to replace those (generally used because they're easy, cheap, and "good enough"), you have to provide something much better. (As the iPhone did to the smartphone market, for example). Making yet another copy of Unix isn't going to provide much interest (or value). Randy.