From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "G.B." <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Could you write a BSD like os in ADA?
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:54:19 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ngshun$ngi$1@dont-email.me>
References: <79e591f0-3c3e-42b2-ad1f-3e59a031531e@googlegroups.com>
 <ng9l30$rc9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ngqr34$c98$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <ngqtla$1eej$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ngsac9$tmq$1@dont-email.me>
 <ngsbn4$1b6s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ngschk$5f3$1@dont-email.me>
 <5731c8ee$0$28117$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 11:50:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c";
	logging-data="24082"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+iC4SvxT6KiXKoWAEUx545oOQT37ZQxNg="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
In-Reply-To: <5731c8ee$0$28117$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ikAXQATieMpgfvuqi3ZMsKENDtI=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30376
Date: 2016-05-10T13:54:19+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 10.05.16 13:41, Xavier Petit wrote:
> Le 10/05/2016 12:21, G.B. a écrit :
>> Usual requirements for winning the competition:
>>
>> - works well enough
>>
>> - is the less expensive alternative
>>
> Like an iPhone ?

iPhone is the very product that made apparent how other phones
did not work well enough in 2007.

Now compare C-BSD to Ada-BSD in terms of which will
show that the other does not work well enough.