From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "G.B." <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Operating System differences and Ada OS independent programming
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:42:46 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <nd0g57$nfm$2@dont-email.me>
References: <56eff4a4$0$4238$e4fe514c@news.kpn.nl>
 <dta0fbll6sipc98r88nacm4k9adthj3amn@4ax.com> <ncpr5p$mnb$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <ncr0jc$qi6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ncr9a6$8a8$1@dont-email.me>
 <f9c013f4-7886-4c17-9319-8392ba17f11f@googlegroups.com>
 <nctkn9$rjn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ncubb2$o98$1@dont-email.me>
 <nd06sh$18k3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nd0g2h$nfm$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:39:35 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c";
	logging-data="24054"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+M0U7aLNpLQx7db4veQ+Y/qkKLb+z0yg4="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
In-Reply-To: <nd0g2h$nfm$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1QWo5FgDqu1+82SUayyleV/AXh8=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29877
Date: 2016-03-24T11:42:46+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 24.03.16 11:41, G.B. wrote:
> If the program was developed without many features required
> of the file system, then the source text that names files
> would not need to be recompiled by any configurable implementation
> of Ada.

"edited for", I meant.