From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,18e682cb937b2c58 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!blackbush.cw.net!cw.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!news100.image.dk!fi.sn.net!newsfeed2.fi.sn.net!newsfeed3.funet.fi!newsfeeds.funet.fi!feeder2.news.jippii.net!feeder1.news.jippii.net!reader1.news.jippii.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Tapio Kelloniemi Subject: GMGPL vs. LGPL, was: Re: ANN: Update to AdaGPGME and libgpg-error References: Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:56:35 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.30.176.187 X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@saunalahti.com X-Trace: reader1.news.jippii.net 1112162195 217.30.176.187 (Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:56:35 EEST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:56:35 EEST Organization: Saunalahti Customer Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10134 Date: 2005-03-30T05:56:35+00:00 List-Id: Jeff C wrote: >One note..While I am a big fan of the GMGPL approach, it is not really >clear that it is entirely helpful in this case since GNUPG itself >appears to be GPL without exception... Why do all Ada softwrae use "GMGPL" instead of Lesser General Public License? I'm not a lawyer and probably reading the both texts would not make me wiser at all. -- Tapio