From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Object Pascal vs Ada -- which is better for a hobbyist? Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:38:37 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:35:30 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c"; logging-data="9562"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19F3fM/cojszIVpiuu1j4wvRFtI+DDZ8+Y=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:cjV8dP7l03G020v8PLfpDl2N2vM= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29780 Date: 2016-03-15T15:38:37+01:00 List-Id: On 15.03.16 14:18, G.B. wrote: > > Nor does any of the mainstream languages define anything > in the language that specifically addresses GUI things. BTW, some portable GUI related ideas such as OpenGL _could_ have portable operators forthcoming, insofar as operators involve general practice like manipulating vectors. These objects tend to be representable in many languages. But, alas, APL's choice of symbols was too large, the language designers went too far for that idea to be appreciated as what it is: serious.