From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "G.B." <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Object Pascal vs Ada -- which is better for a hobbyist?
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:18:35 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <nc91tg$me0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <b478db8c-2eda-43fc-a3b3-aeca2a634bf2@googlegroups.com>
 <cba85e69-b013-41b3-87db-29e2dd618ca0@googlegroups.com>
 <nc6v52$rra$3@dont-email.me> <dkq1grF4m4mU1@mid.individual.net>
 <nc8l00$4t6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <dkq4j1F5fesU1@mid.individual.net>
 <nc8nqs$9j7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <dkq6kkF605nU1@mid.individual.net>
 <dkq7srF690oU1@mid.individual.net>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:15:28 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c";
	logging-data="22976"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18oTvRqCThYBuaTcUUvDV2Wtjn9BmFhlIA="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
In-Reply-To: <dkq7srF690oU1@mid.individual.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AcSR17hyCKj5qEnYCjv5v08mGTw=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29776
Date: 2016-03-15T14:18:35+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 15.03.16 11:53, egarrulo wrote:
> On 15/03/16 11:31, egarrulo wrote:
>> I agree that the background of people is what matters the most
>
> But then, when someone comes and asks such a generic question, he
> obviously doesn't know what he is talking about, and he elicits a
> matching answer.

It is interesting that some still maintain the idea
that portable GUI programming has a place. It hasn't,
with a possible exception of big corporate legacy.

Nor does any of the mainstream languages define anything
in the language that specifically addresses GUI things.

This hobby horse is riding towards a dead end, in solitude.