From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Looking for better Ada books Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:29:31 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <6dda98bb-0bff-4e5f-b601-e64791f32db6@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:26:25 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c"; logging-data="13680"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+YRH41sI7xchIJWEZBOEswiLRBjy1X4EQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:uB/dV5mskw+zZh3HQtv7Zzg1kgc= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29717 Date: 2016-03-11T15:29:31+01:00 List-Id: On 10.03.16 22:39, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> What is your definition of better books? >> > >> >You are way behind technologies for sure. > Sure seems like my library of dusty old Ada books. Most of which I haven't > opened in decades...:-) > Being with the latest, greatest and largest version of Ada is one thing, having a good technical writer's book on Ada is another. The latter quality of being a writer that the reader finds readable can help quite a bit even when the subject is "older" Ada. Namely, whenever the author is a good match for the reader's learning habits.