From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: pragma Thread_Local_Storage on record? Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:55:46 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <87k2lmmf5w.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <0e3fb431-ee4b-46ca-b1a5-a78e3245d7f3@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bqgfK7NL3xTHnr0WRaLl4g.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29636 Date: 2016-03-01T16:55:46+01:00 List-Id: On 01/03/2016 16:22, hanslad@gmail.com wrote: > >> I suspect that one of the components of type Core is itself a record >> and has a component which is not statically initialized. [..] I don't see how his could be useful for a messages queue which is normally shared between several tasks rather than owned by any. The latter looks like a low-level implementation-motivated design. > Any idea on how I could implement such buffer in a Thread local data structure(record)? A typical solution is Ada.Task_Attributes instantiated with an access type to the object. The object is allocated on demand (access dereference by the owner task). -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de