From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,3d3f20d31be1c33a X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public From: nagle@netcom.com (John Nagle) Subject: Re: Safety-critical development in Ada and Eiffel Date: 1997/07/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 257526055 Sender: nagle@netcom6.netcom.com References: <33C56F97.1223@gsfc.nasa.gov> <5qc53v$kb6@alumni.rpi.edu> <33CBF5DE.D5FB1B6C@munich.netsurf.de> Organization: Netcom On-Line Services Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1997-07-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Joachim Durchholz writes: >Steve Furlong wrote: >> get or free memory. If your process _must_ check ports every 10 ms, >> you can't be waiting half a second for memory compaction. >Arrgh! Will that idea nevere go away!! >The best available GC algorithms don't go away for compacting; they run >in parallel with the normal program (as a coroutine if you don't want a >preemptive scheduler). >> Modern GC presumably can get around that problem, >That reads "definitely", not "presumably". The algorithms are there. If only the Java people would use them. John Nagle