From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b6d862eabdeb1fc4 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps82.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Duke Normandin Subject: Re: Ada noob here! Is Ada widely used? References: <20100520192448.836181A795C@www.ecn.org> <87d3wqbayp.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <1lEJn.4421$Z6.759@edtnps82> <4bf7cbbe$0$2374$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Darwin) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 13:17:07 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.154.122.116 X-Trace: edtnps82 1274534227 75.154.122.116 (Sat, 22 May 2010 07:17:07 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 07:17:07 MDT Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11881 Date: 2010-05-22T13:17:07+00:00 List-Id: On 2010-05-22, Peter C. Chapin wrote: > Duke Normandin wrote: > >> Nothing too terribly mind-boggling! ;) Just don't want to spend the time >> learning a "soon-to-be" fossil of a language, with no where to go but in a >> museum. Been there; done that! I'm also looking at learning Miranda - but >> guess what? Nice, simple functional language - but zero community and >> support. It _may_ get a second life - maybe. Meanwhile, I'm liking Ada. > > Ada is definitely not a fossil, nor is it likely to become a fossil in the > near future. It's true that Ada doesn't have the tool, library, and community > support that C++ and Java enjoys (in terms of sheer quantity at least), but > there are definitely all three of those things available for Ada. Also the > language has an updated standard in the works. I'm seeing that Ada is alive and well, and still "strutting her stuff" ;) Just had to be sure, is all.... > If you are looking at functional languages have you considered OCaml? It has a > lively community. An alternative might be F#, Microsoft's ML-like functional > language for .NET. It's shiny and new, and Microsoft fully supports it with > Visual Studio 2010. It even runs on Linux/Mono. Other than that I don't know > much about it. :) I quit smoking Camel cigarettes 10 years ago. Whenever I go near the OCaml language, I get antsy for a cigarette. ;) Haskell is too much like "a hassle". OTOH, Miranda conjures up fond memories of long ago ... ;) -- Duke *** Tolerance becomes a crime, when applied to evil [Thomas Mann] ***