From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,245c84afd1e393ce
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!209.244.4.230!newsfeed1.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What about big integers in Ada 2005?
Date: 15 Sep 2005 16:10:22 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <nMb36oWeak4o@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <dgc9f5$1b8$1@news.task.gda.pl>
 <1581461.uQ1jN63t33@linux1.krischik.com> <dgclij$4lq$1@news.task.gda.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1126818549 19916 192.135.80.34 (15 Sep 2005
 21:09:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:09:09 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4756
Date: 2005-09-15T16:10:22-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <dgclij$4lq$1@news.task.gda.pl>, jtg <jtg77@poczta.onet.pl> writes:
> Martin Krischik wrote:
> 
>> 
>> You are mistaken here. i.E GNAT supports 64 integers for 32 bit CPUs. It's
>> all up to the particular compiler. In theory you could create an Ada
>> compiler which supports intergers up to the memory limit - it would still
>> conform to the standart.
>> 
> 
> I know, but since it is not a standard Ada feature, it would be useless
> anyway. Programs using this feature would not conform to the standard.

Certainly they would comply (unless a standard more recent than I have
read says something about 32 or 64 bits).  I recall a lower limit of
16 bit support, but no upper limit.