"Stephen Leake" wrote:
> "Peter Hend�n" writes:

> > I have been thinking about implementing the DOM in Ada. The
> > with'ing problem makes separating the type definitions difficult.

> GNAT offers a solution: "with type foo;". This is under discussion as
> an addition to Ada; give it a try, and encourage your other compiler
> vendors to implement it!
Thanks, Stephen, just what I needed.

I have tried this out in a couple of small-ish pilot projects, and I can
say that it solves the few problems I've seen with Ada as an OO
language.

Does anyone know where the "official" discussions stand with
regard to the various solutions proposed to the with-ing problem?

> "with type" is documented in the JGNAT user guide, but is implemented
> in standard GNAT as well.
I've also come up against a bug in GNAT (at least that's what GNAT
itself claims). Is there a publically available known bug list, so I could
check against it before I submit a report?

Regards,
Peter

--
Peter Hend�n           http://www.algonet.se/~phenden
ICQ: 14672398
Teknisk Dokumentation AB          http://www.tdab.com